Which analogy best describes a relationship comparable to "criminal : scorn"?

The relationship "criminal : scorn" reflects a scenario where the status of being a criminal leads to a negative societal response, which in this case, is scorn. In this analogy, the first term denotes a specific identity or role, while the second term reflects a specific emotional reaction typically directed towards someone inhabiting that role.

Considering this pattern, the analogy "hero : worship" aligns well with the original. A hero, much like a criminal, is a specific identity, but the associated response is positive; society often worships or highly esteems individuals recognized as heroes. Just as a criminal may evoke scorn due to their actions, a hero elicits worship as a result of their noble deeds. This pairing highlights the strong reactions—negative or positive—people have toward these specific identities.

The other options do not conform to this emotional reaction structure as effectively. For instance, "culprit : shame" suggests guilt but lacks the broader societal response element. "Hero : remember" indicates a state of being remembered but lacks the direct emotional response. Finally, "culprit : absolve" introduces the notion of forgiveness, which doesn't resonate as a direct societal reaction comparable to scorn or worship. Thus, the analogy "hero : worship"